After a long time, Scotland decided to become independent. It will cut its relationship with the UK and be an independent country. But would Scotland’s independence be good for Scotland?
Would Scotland’s independence be good for Scotland? Of course, Scotland’s independence will make this country wealthier, happier, and fairer.
Indeed, the Scottish parliament has been seeking independence for a long time, so this government has been trying to have its own identity and be separated from the UK.
But what will happen to this country after the independence? Would Scotland’s independence be good for Scotland?
Independence can make significant changes for Scotland, and we cannot say that Scottish independence will make this country prosperous.
Whether or not would Scotland’s independence is good for Scotland depends on the way the government is going to manage this country after its independence.
Indeed, the government must make democratic decisions for Scotland to make it wealthier, fairer, and more successful.
Generally, the independence of Scotland will cause people to have a better life and feel relaxed. Indeed, the Westminster government doesn’t support Scottish people’s lives in Scotland.
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been trying to hold a second referendum to have an independent Scotland.
Indeed, in the 2014 referendum, 55 percent of voters voted for staying in the UK. Much to the chagrin of Unionists, the Scottish government has decided to hold another referendum next October. But from Brexit to a scandal-plagued prime minister occupying Downing Street, a lot has changed since the last vote.
The advantages and disadvantages of Scottish independence
Would Scotland’s independence be good for Scotland? That’s a question that has involved everyone’s mind these days. Indeed, Nicola Sturgeon has been trying to hold another referendum to separate the UK from Scotland.
However, it is not clear whether or not she will achieve her goal. But she has declared a series of decisions that she has made for an independent Scotland. No one knows what will happen after the second referendum.
Scotland’s first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, has shown her documents for the second referendum. Meanwhile, “there are major doubts about his ability to deliver new vote”, said the Telegraph, “with the UK government opposed to any further referendum and experts believing it is not within Holyrood’s powers to ‘organize meaningful referendum itself’.
Nicola Sturgeon told a press conference in Edinburg on Tuesday that she had an “indisputable mandate” for a new referendum, but Boris Johnson insisted SNP must respect the 2014 referendum result.
Statistics show that most Scots disagree with Scottish independence and don’t want to participate in another referendum. Although, some Scottish people are waiting for another referendum in October.
Indeed, Scotland has had reasonable control over the operation of its health service since 1999, devolution regulations. However, funding and overall policy decisions currently rest with Westminster.
Sturgeon could show a good reaction towards the Covid; during the pandemic, Scotland didn’t face many affected people to Covid. It indicates that Scots had a better power to handle the Covid crisis.
Scotland may soon have a referendum.
Scotland may soon have a referendum in October to realize the number of people who agree with Scottish independence.
Indeed, Scotland will hold this referendum to decide whether or not to remain part of the UK. There are lots of important matters that are related to this referendum.
Different matters like economic matters are essential keys to Scottish independence. Scotland’s first minister has announced that she will hold the second referendum by the end of 2023.
Indeed, the first referendum was in 2014, less than a decade from the first referendum. In 2014, 45% of voters agreed with Scottish independence. However, 55% of Scottish people at that time were against Scottish independence.
But which economic theories are going to change the economy of Scotland? The first was during 2014 caused Scotland to remain in the European Union.
This is why, following Brexit, debates about a second independence referendum gained a new edge, particularly as the Scottish electorate voted in favour of remaining in the EU by 62% to 38%.
The Scottish government believes that the UK’s separation from the EU will be a good chance for Scottish independence victory. So Brexit will be an excellent opportunity for Scottish independence.
In contrast, the UK government argues that the 2014 vote settled Scotland’s constitutional status for at least a generation.
The least opinion polling continues to show that the country remains relatively split on Scotland’s constitutional status.
Nicola Sturgeon has promised that Scottish independence will happen very soon; she has said it would take place next year.
However, The UK government disagrees with this event and doesn’t let the next referendum happen next year.
Indeed, there are significant pros and cons that Scottish independence will include for this country:
Pro: Scotland will join the European Union if it becomes an independent country. Scotland was a country that disagreed with Brexit in 2016, So after its independence, it could enter the European Union without any trouble and use the benefits of this rejoining.
- Con: England is the most important trading partner of Scotland. According to Scottish Government statistics, the UK accounts for 60% of Scottish exports (excluding oil and gas), compared to the EU’s 19% and global exports of 21%.
This could become more complicated if the country rejoined the EU, thereby “tearing Scotland out of the customs union and single market of the United Kingdom”, said the Spectator’s Fraser Nelson.
The BBC said the international border between Scotland and England would likely increase the cost of trade, as “the checks currently delaying trucks at Calais would also be necessary at Gretna”.
Brexit or Scottish independence? Which one costs more for London?
A London School of Economic and Political Science report examining the financial impact of Brexit, trade, and Scottish independence found that “the cost of independence to the Scottish economy is likely to be two three-time larger than the costs of Brexit”.
Rejoining the EU “would do little to mitigate these costs”. The expert’s trade model found that Scotland would be “considerably poorer” if it left the UK.
Although the SNP’s manifesto stated a wish to “control our economic policy” and “create high-quality, sustainable jobs”, Sturgeon told Channel 4 News that the “economic blueprint for independence” is “completely out of date”.
- Pro: Scotland has controlled the operation of its health service since the devolution settlement of 1999. However, funding and overarching policy decisions currently remain with Westminster. Even SNP is going to prevent NHS privatization.
- Con: Scotland’s public deficit is greater than the rest of the UK. It spent £ 36.3 bn more than it raised in tax revenues in 2020-21, according to the Scottish government’s figures reported in the Telegraph.
Scotland “Would not, at least in its early days, be able to run a budget deficit that large for long”, said The New European’s Ball.
And Scotland’s independence will because it loses its access to transitional organizations, including the global trade division at the UN, the G7, and NATO, which is currently granted through its union with the rest of the UK.
The country would need to apply for independent membership in these organizations. While rejoining the EU could help Scotland to establish ties with potential trading partners and forget its political alliances.
This, too, could come at a cost. In 2019, the UK’s net public sector contribution to the EU was estimated at £9.4bn, according to government figures.
Evidence shows that there are two different groups of people in the next referendum of Scotland; some people agree with the second referendum, while a group of people disagree with this referendum.
Scotland’s first minister has promised to change this country. She has pledged that Scotland will be healthier, fairer, and more successful after the second referendum.
